(1) Can social problems be solved? As has been argued throughout the semester, different people, due to the different experiences that they have, “see things” quite differently – each believing that their interpretation of the world is correct.
As a result, people disagree as to whether an objective state of affairs – a social problem – actually exists, and if they do agree on the existence of a social problem, they tend to disagree about the causes of the problem and how we might be able to reduce the extent to which the problem occurs. And yet, some social problems do seem to be reduced: crime rates are down, unemployment rates are down. Others, however, seem to get worse: global warming, pollution, opioid addiction, spiraling health care costs.
Using one of the social problem areas we discussed in class - crime, health care, women's issues - discuss the likelihood that the problems associated with it will be reduced in the foreseeable future. What soical factors will affect how the issues are defined and dealt with? Are we politically grid-locked to the extent that nothing will get done? Is there anything that you could do to affect the outcome?
(2) In her article, “Blood on our Backs,” Karen Coates discusses the plight of Cambodian garment workers that produce clothing sold in the Western world – primarily in the United States by such stores as Old Navy, Target, Walmart and Kohl’s. In so doing, Coats outlines the contrasting perspectives of (1) the workers, mostly young women, who seek a safer work environment and an increase in their meager $80 monthly wage, (2) the garment manufacturers, who prefer to maintain their $5 billion annual exports and their current profit margin, (3) retail stores/corporations such as Walmart that prefer that their costs remain low, and (4) western consumers who also prefer that prices for clothing at these stores remain low and affordable.
As the article indicates, each of these social categories of actors has different beliefs, values, attitudes, and interests. In other words, they inhabit somewhat different cultures and sub-cultures. As a result, they disagree over whether this objective condition really is a problem, what, if anything, should be done about the situation (i.e., whose behavior needs to change), and the likelihood that such efforts would be successful.
In your essay you will answer these four sets of questions:
(1) What are the different cultural perspectives (beliefs, values, attitudes, and interests) of the four categories of social actors listed above? Pay particular attention to the difference you find in their values and indicate how these differences affect their role and position in this state of affairs.
(2) How are these four categories of social actors, which represent regional, national, and global communities, connected in a larger system of relations and how do they interact on a national and global level?
(3) Whether you recognize it or not, your actions as a consumer play a part in the current circumstances in Cambodia. In your view, do you have any social responsibility to act – for example, to boycott stores that carry these products – in order to effect change? What other strategies would you suggest? What are the effects of you not doing anything?
(4) Given the competing interests and differences in power that are attached to the different collective social actors, a solution to this problem will not be easily devised. Cheap labor always seems to be available. And according to Ken Loo, secretary-general of the Cambodian Garment Manufacturers Association, in the end, a few boycotting consumers “can’t do anything.” Discuss what you believe to be the responsibility of each of the groups to solve the problems associated with the situation. In your view, are these difficulties insurmountable? Why or why not?
